Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru
 
 

Go Back   Guild Wars Forums - GW Guru > The Hall of Knowledge > Gladiator's Arena

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 04, 2010, 08:02 AM // 08:02   #21
lemming
The Hotshot
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Honolulu
Guild: International District [id多]
Advertisement

Disable Ads
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Missing HB View Post
The only thing they had to do was to remove a quest , and to fix 2 teleporting skills thats all.
About those people farming the title : anyway , every place has syncers , and there weren't so many in HB .
I don't disagree with you that they didn't try very hard to fix HB, but you're delusional.
__________________

Interested in GvG? Want to watch some high-level PvP? Check out some streams and recordings!
lemming is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 04, 2010, 12:46 PM // 12:46   #22
Stormz
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Profession: Mo/R
Default

I'm surprised of the lenghts people go for a title,and waste their time on bots and such, i wonder why these people even ever bought the game.Either you 'play' a game or not.Just comfirms my intuition,why some high ranks act so noobisch.One would hope ppl with a rank have similar exp to you.

I recently had a few rounds in Codex, to me the basic idear isn't that bad, it supports people making their own characterbuilds and without heroes,with given amount of skills, wich is good.On the other side, the same problems arise as in TA and HA, long waiting times to find decent players and exagerated planning,wich mostly leads nowhere, critisism on you're chosen build wich is silly cause you only have an amount of skills to choose from.

Last edited by Stormz; May 04, 2010 at 12:59 PM // 12:59..
Stormz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 04, 2010, 02:03 PM // 14:03   #23
McMullen
Krytan Explorer
 
McMullen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Profession: R/W
Default

Believe or not, CA is fun.. Albeit only on Z-quest days but if you can get a coordinated group together instead of just sitting around spamming "LFG" and complaining about rank discrimination and general assholery then fun can be had.
So, I think they should "fix" CA (just add new maps and features to attract players) and fix HB and reinstate it.

Last edited by McMullen; May 05, 2010 at 10:53 AM // 10:53..
McMullen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 05, 2010, 12:22 AM // 00:22   #24
Corporeal Ghost
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McMullen View Post
Believe or not, CA is fun.. Ableit only on Z-quest days but if you can get a coordinated group together instead of just sitting around spamming "LFG" and complaining about rank discrimination and general assholery then fun can be had.
So, I think they should "fix" CA (just add new maps and features to attract players) and fix HB and reinstate it.
I have seen multiple posts on these very forums to this effect, yet get no response:

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/c...t10435758.html

And people wonder why the arena (/game) is dead.


Sankt, I just want you to know that it took an extraordinary amount of effort not to derail this thread into a rant on hero battles. So here's a link to an old post that explains my feelings pretty well:

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/r...16#post4978916
Corporeal Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 05, 2010, 12:43 AM // 00:43   #25
Sankt Hallvard
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corporeal Ghost View Post
Sankt, I just want you to know that it took an extraordinary amount of effort not to derail this thread into a rant on hero battles. So here's a link to an old post that explains my feelings pretty well:

http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/r...16#post4978916
Hey man, I'm glad you make some extra effort to avoid derailing guru-threads. But why does my name come up? I just went through the thread to see if I had posted some of my regular bs but I couldn't find anything. (I can't rule out that I have posted something but a mod has deleted it - in fact, it sounds plausible..)

Anyway, I don't have any strong feelings about CA at all so this thread has been very easy to avoid for me. I don't play CA, I don't have any plans to try it again and I don't mind if people waste their lives grinding out a codex title. (They are still called honor pts?)

I agree completely with your wall of text in the link you provided. Also noticed you mentioned the HB maps were available in TA for a week? Shame I missed out on that, would be pretty interesting.
Sankt Hallvard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 05, 2010, 06:53 AM // 06:53   #26
The Drunkard
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Guild: Still looking
Profession: Rt/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regulus X View Post
I think there're a very small group of players that're abusing of the inactivity in CA. In other words: given no players are around (especially at dead hours), a guild decides to enter-resign-enter-resign-enter-resign, possibly even scripting/botting this action. I think it's following along a worse path of abuse than HB has ever had in it's past.

My vote is that the GWLT remove Codex to prevent players from getting to maxed ranks via abuse. They're exploiting the system, it's wrong, and I know that any nay-sayers that pop up here and try to retort are the very players abusing of this.
It was possible with TA and RA as well, you can't counter inactivity.

I'm really struggling to understand why people think that TA was so populated before it was scraped, there were never more than 10 players in the district on non-zquest days and most of the fights came from RAers moving on. I personally didn't enjoy it with the hexway garbage that other teams ran. Could it have been saved? It was a possibility if they would've incorperated other game formats such as capture points or king-of-the-hill and rebalanced the obviously broken skills that plagued it; Anet instead decided enough was enough.

Codex suffers the same inactivity problems that TA has because they didn't figure it out the first time, they probably won't to much to it anyways. I don't mind it being scrapped, but I don't want to see any more hero vs. hero flagging garbage ever again.
The Drunkard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 05, 2010, 01:30 PM // 13:30   #27
Karate Jesus
Forge Runner
 
Karate Jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Guild: Reign of Judgment [RoJ]
Profession: Me/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Drunkard View Post
It was possible with TA and RA as well, you can't counter inactivity.
Um....no it wasn't. You can't sync full-bot teams to /resign for you in RA, and that never would have happened in TA. There were always at least 2 teams playing (even during dead hours) and that would have messed up the sync.

Just a little heads up, it requires NO teams for bot resigning to work. That's how bad it's gotten in CA, that a team can win 283 consecutive CA battles while afk because no one else was playing it that night. For 12 hours....only 4 players and 4 bots played CA.
Karate Jesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 06, 2010, 01:39 AM // 01:39   #28
Corporeal Ghost
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sankt Hallvard View Post
Hey man, I'm glad you make some extra effort to avoid derailing guru-threads. But why does my name come up? I just went through the thread to see if I had posted some of my regular bs but I couldn't find anything.
You have my apologies. That was aimed a Missing HB; guess I was doing too many things at once.
Corporeal Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 07, 2010, 01:07 AM // 01:07   #29
The Drunkard
Wilds Pathfinder
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Guild: Still looking
Profession: Rt/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karate Jesus View Post
Um....no it wasn't. You can't sync full-bot teams to /resign for you in RA, and that never would have happened in TA. There were always at least 2 teams playing (even during dead hours) and that would have messed up the sync.

Just a little heads up, it requires NO teams for bot resigning to work. That's how bad it's gotten in CA, that a team can win 283 consecutive CA battles while afk because no one else was playing it that night. For 12 hours....only 4 players and 4 bots played CA.
I never said botting was feasable, only the process of guilds abusing inactivity in the arenas was. Please do not put words into my mouth.
The Drunkard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2010, 08:06 PM // 20:06   #30
Fluffy Kittens
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Default

I'm syncing every day and alrdy got my r5 codex title without more than 10 real fights maybe. <3 anet, ty for letting me do this I love abusing <3<3<3
Fluffy Kittens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10, 2010, 09:47 PM // 21:47   #31
bitchbar player
Krytan Explorer
 
bitchbar player's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: still lost
Guild: Guy In Real Life [GIRL]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rezz Anna Nicole View Post
I'm syncing every day and alrdy got my r5 codex title without more than 10 real fights maybe. <3 anet, ty for letting me do this I love abusing <3<3<3
that is why you only play sin.
bitchbar player is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2010, 10:39 PM // 22:39   #32
Div
I like yumy food!
 
Div's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Where I can eat yumy food
Guild: Dead Alley [dR]
Profession: Mo/R
Default

Isn't it a pretty easy ban for both botting (on second accs) and toa violation (on main accs)? Probably the easiest of all the botting to detect.
Div is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2010, 01:57 PM // 13:57   #33
RhanoctJocosa
Legendary Korean
 
RhanoctJocosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Guild: The Benecia Renovatio [RenO]
Profession: W/
Default

idk i think anet are just retarded, the same bots play in RA & tombs every single day even though they probably get reported 30+ times

/sigh

ps remove CA, add TA. thanks~
RhanoctJocosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2010, 02:34 PM // 14:34   #34
Eragon Zarroc
Atra esterní ono thelduin
 
Eragon Zarroc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Madness Incarnate
Guild: [Duo]
Profession: W/P
Default

i think they should make codex random enter with the limited bars ;-) that would be fun
Eragon Zarroc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2010, 03:32 PM // 15:32   #35
Karate Jesus
Forge Runner
 
Karate Jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Guild: Reign of Judgment [RoJ]
Profession: Me/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Div View Post
Isn't it a pretty easy ban for both botting (on second accs) and toa violation (on main accs)? Probably the easiest of all the botting to detect.
I would be if the bots were easy to detect, but they're not. On top of that, often players will Red Resign with other players, and as we all know Anet doesn't ban for that Zzz

Oh, and by the way, Anet doesn't give a rat's ass about Codex according to several people I know on the TK. They don't even test skill changes there. Like nothing....at all. They're considering changing/improving the format, but haven't even laid down ideas yet.

Same thing also goes for HA. They don't test skill changes there.

Last edited by Karate Jesus; May 20, 2010 at 05:02 PM // 17:02..
Karate Jesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2010, 04:44 PM // 16:44   #36
Corporeal Ghost
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karate Jesus
Oh, and by the way, Anet doesn't give a rat's ass about Codex according to several people I know on the TK. They don't even test skill changes there. Like nothing....at all. They're considering changing/improving the format, but having even laid down ideas yet.
Why would they test skill changes in codex? Half the point of a limitednformat is it doesn't require much attention once the parameters are correct (they are not yet).

Barring skills like EDA which have the capacity to dominate every match by themselves, there really isn't much that overpowered skills could do to the format even if it had people.

As for HA, it's not like it has a fundamentally different skillset than GvG. The balance issues should be roughly the same. The important ones (that will not be addressed) certainly are. The only real difference is he small subset of skills the community has decided is necessary for actual halls matches.
Corporeal Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 21, 2010, 06:56 AM // 06:56   #37
Missing HB
Desert Nomad
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Guild: Anna
Profession: A/
Default

Actually , it's been 1 month and half the skill update was announced , and we still have nothing ( war in kryta content thing also) . Regarding what they say they will do , and what is done , how long after , nothing will happen in codex for sure . The easiest would be , however , to re-implement HB and TA , since it would not require much work at all
Missing HB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30, 2010, 05:38 AM // 05:38   #38
The Template
Ascalonian Squire
 
The Template's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Serenity Temple
Guild: The Obscure Monks [MonK]
Profession: Mo/
Default

UGH I hate to be negative but , we all knew codex was going to bomb. ofc ppl are going to exploit the dead areas. screw anet for this shit, feels kind of like entrapment to me. as for devaluing the title? heehe anyone who has that title maxed most likely HAD to exploit to do it...damn you a-net, put out areas where it doesnt suck sooo RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GOing bad that you have to cheat to get anywhere. what a joke.. Hire me . even I can do better ..... lamerz...
The Template is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 25, 2010, 10:05 PM // 22:05   #39
Elu Arina
Ascalonian Squire
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Guild: [Pi]
Profession: Mo/
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corporeal Ghost View Post
As for HA, it's not like it has a fundamentally different skillset than GvG. The balance issues should be roughly the same. The important ones (that will not be addressed) certainly are. The only real difference is he small subset of skills the community has decided is necessary for actual halls matches.
Actually, the balance issues in HA and GvG /are/ fundamentally differently. AoE is much more effective in HA. HA requires run buffs that can be applied to at least 2 people for relic running. You also have to have a build that can be effective at capping shrines (on the off chance you get those maps anyway). In GvG, though, you need a flag runner; Your builds aren't constrained by certain map types. You're midline isn't used for damage; You'll possibly run a split, a concept that doesn't really have a direct analog with HA, as well as other differences. All of this leads to vastly different builds, especially in intent and purpose. Anyone who tries to alter only a few issues and expects both formats to be balanced has either never played either format seriously or is incredibly naive.
Elu Arina is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2010, 11:53 PM // 23:53   #40
Corporeal Ghost
Lion's Arch Merchant
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elu Arina View Post
Actually, the balance issues in HA and GvG /are/ fundamentally differently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corporeal Ghost
The important ones (that will not be addressed) certainly are [the same].
Including, but not limited to, armor levels, damage v. mitigation, ranged damage, and the fact that teams can stall out for twenty or thirty minutes at a time with no deaths, and that certain arenas of play make this a desirable tactic. Skill balance isn't even close to the biggest problem with the game, so it's pretty irrelevant that a handful of HA-exclusive skills make builds slightly different. And until ANet both understands and acts on this, we're pretty much boned.
Corporeal Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Share This Forum!  
 
 
           

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:36 AM // 04:36.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.